![]() ![]() ![]() Why watch: We’re quite sure we don’t need to ask if you remember the instant classic these two staged at the 2021 Final Four. But Arkansas’s depth should mean it is better equipped to handle another second-half surge from the Huskies. Why it could disappoint: The Razorbacks are long and athletic throughout the lineup but could still struggle to match up with UConn’s Adama Sanogo, one of the game’s most effective post performers. UConn’s success tends to hinge on the efficiency of facilitators Tristen Newton and Andre Jackson. The Huskies appear to have regained their early-season form when they started 14-0. The Razorbacks were wildly inconsistent all season right up through the SEC Tournament but are playing their best ball now thanks in large part to Ricky Council IV and Nick Smith. ![]() Why watch: It’s hard to know just what to expect from either squad. Hopefully, the crew will be able to strike the right balance. If either physicality is largely permitted or a tight whistle results in a nonstop parade to the free-throw line, the aesthetics will not be pleasing. The manner in which this contest is officiated will have a major impact on how the proceedings unfold. Why it could disappoint: Let’s not sugarcoat this – Tennessee’s games can be downright ugly. Florida Atlantic has a deep guard rotation that could help against the relentless ball pressure, but Johnell Davis and Alijah Martin are usually the most dependable scoring options. Tennessee relies on lock-down defense and timely shooting from Santiago Vescovi. The short-handed Volunteers defied numerous upset predictions, while the Owls picked up their first two NCAA tourney wins in program history to get here. Why watch: With the exception of Friday’s contest involving Princeton, this is arguably the least likely pairing of the round of 16. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |